The QA Problem
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Wed Jan 3 20:04:40 UTC 2007
Will Woods (wwoods at redhat.com) said:
> So. Does that define The QA Problem? Or are there other issues I'm
> forgetting?
If we're going to support 'always being able to upgrade in the
devel stream to stable, and vice versa', we need to eliminate things
that break upgrades.
This involves:
1) automated post-build testing. Find broken packages before they
go anywhere. Which means we need to find all the things that
could break the repository, and write tests for them.
2) non-automated post-build testing before packages are pushed. Includes:
- smoke testing
- %post/%preun/%etc auditing
Presumably more stuff that I'm missing here.
Bill
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list