[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The Multimedia Question



On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 14:11 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:

> -1:  Based on Fedora with non-free, patent-encumbered-in-the-US (peitUS)
> software can be called "Fedora"
> 0 :  Based on Fedora with non-free maybe-peitUS but distributable can be
> called "Fedora"
> 1 :  Based on Fedora with free but peitUS can be called "Fedora"
> 2 :  Based on Fedora with free and maybe-peitUS but distributable can be
> called "Fedora"
> 3 :  Based on Fedora with free and not peitUS can be called "Fedora"
> 
> We have 3 currently.  We know that -1 is already disallowed by the
> standing trademark guidelines, right?  Some people argue we have 0 with
> firmware.  What we are discussing here is, what do we want to do with 1
> and 2.

Sorry, that was close but missed a level 4, which is where we are really
at.

4 : Based on Fedora with free and not peitUS and in Fedora SCM can be
called "Fedora"

Fedora trademark guidelines -- only 4 allowed.

Fedora spirit so far -- 3 and 4 allowed.

Questions are about 1 and 2.

We're sure we don't want 0 by itself, although we accept 0 (Fluendo)
along with $something.

We know -1 is not going to be called Fedora, at least in this decade.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]