The Multimedia Question

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:58 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

> So I could I could use revisor and make a distribution and call it
> the Livestock Insemination Operating System (LIOS), a Fedora Community
> Derivative.
> Where its clear that the primary mark is the leading mark and the
> community derived mark is more in the spirit of an accreditation or
> certification mark.

This is therefore a different discussion, but closely related to, the
"what will we allow in Fedora proper" question.

Can we define a set of criteria whereby "Foo, a Fedora Community
Derivative" is possible?  How different is that criteria from what goes
into what we mark as "Fedora"?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070723/efead39b/attachment.sig>