[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The Multimedia Question

On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:58 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

> So I could I could use revisor and make a distribution and call it
> the Livestock Insemination Operating System (LIOS), a Fedora Community
> Derivative.
> Where its clear that the primary mark is the leading mark and the
> community derived mark is more in the spirit of an accreditation or
> certification mark.

This is therefore a different discussion, but closely related to, the
"what will we allow in Fedora proper" question.

Can we define a set of criteria whereby "Foo, a Fedora Community
Derivative" is possible?  How different is that criteria from what goes
into what we mark as "Fedora"?

- Karsten
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]