[Fwd: License issue with iText and releated packages]

[Andrew Overholt]

On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 18:09 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Given this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236309#c3
> 
> ...is there any merit in FPC asking package maintainers to go through
> their Java-including packages looking for similar issues?  Or even
> just
> having FPC issue a statement reiterating the need for maintainers to
> check the code they're entering into the repos? 

In general we're all pretty careful.  I think this is probably an
isolated case because the excellent work done by both JPackage and our
maintainers almost always results in clean packages -- both from a build
and packaging granularity standpoint and from a licencing one.

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070622/a92f1154/attachment.sig>