@FESCo (and in parts maybe for the Board, too): How to handle packaging issues for EPEL?

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Mar 18 15:02:55 UTC 2007


Brian Pepple schrieb:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:38 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> It's afaics like this: The Packaging Committee handles all issues around
>> Packaging for both Fedora and EPEL. The EPEL-SIG can define rules about
>> maintaining packages in the repo (like for example the "Package
>> Maintenance And Updates policy for EPEL
>> "http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies/PackageMaintenanceAndUpdates
>> ), but no exceptions for "theoretical" packaging (e.g. how to write spec
>> files) itself.
>> Is this correct? Do you guys want something different?
> Seems like a reasonable policy.  Is there anyone on the Packaging
> Committee that is also involved in EPEL?  If not, there probably should
> be.

Axel Thimm is members of both groups. Spot himself is interested in EPEL
afaics, too. Rex seems to be interested in EPEL a bit as well.

Cu
thl




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list