fesco, fpc and epel relationships

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Mon Mar 19 16:59:15 UTC 2007


On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:46:31AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 17:44 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > > I don't see why the FPC can't do "EPEL" specific guidelines where
> > > relevant.
> > 
> > Neither do I, but we need the authority and commitment.
> 
> No one has said that FPC doesn't have the authority.
> EPEL is a Fedora project.
> 
> Thus, I hereby deem that FPC has the authority.
> 
> As to the commitment, I have it. I can only speak for myself on such
> matters.

Same here, so let's formalize it at tomorrow's IRC meeting (the
commitment) and the authority is asserted until the board says
otherwise.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20070319/63015da5/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list