GPL and storage requirements

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Sun Mar 25 13:41:27 UTC 2007


Luis Villa wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Matt Domsch <matt at domsch.com> wrote:
>> > No, that is what 3(c) is for. Only Fedora carries the long-term
>> > storage requirements in that case. (And as far as I can see, if you're
>> > still distributing FC1, Fedora has no problem with nearly indefinite
>> > storage.)
>>
>> That's the problem.  We don't have infinite and indefinite storage,
>
> Which 'we'? Fedora? or Fedora's mirrors? I guess I assumed the primary
> goal here was to reduce demands on mirrors, not on Fedora.
Fedora, right now we've got 43G free on the primary mirror.  I want to 
know what our options are.

    -Mike




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list