GFDL and documentation freedom (was: Re: FS/OSS license: not quite enough of a requirement)

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 20:04 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:58 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > Now, I don't know whether any software in Fedora is under this
> > license.  But our policies permit software under this license to be
> > integrated. 
> 
> As much as I don't want to be on this thread...
> 
> Nothing in Fedora is using the Reciprocal License at this time.
> Nothing in Fedora is using any _known_ non-free license at this time,
> with the exception of firmware.
> 
> Alexandre, I know that you feel strongly on these issues, and I also
> know that you and Rahul are likely to argue perpetually, while actually
> agreeing on things.
> 
> I suggest that you guys either take it off list, or move on to proposing
> drafts.

+ ∞

josh