summary of firstboot and EULA changes in Fedora 7

Max Spevack mspevack at redhat.com
Fri May 18 19:01:47 UTC 2007


On Fri, 18 May 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On May 18, 2007, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 17 May 2007 16:45:48 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> Is it correct to assume that the legal implications of this move have
>>> been run through legal
>
>> Given that Max has said "A full copy of the proposed EULA is attached, and in
>> its current form it has been approved by Legal." I would say yes.
>
> No so fast!  Per what Max had written, legal had approved the EULA.
> What he wrote then didn't apply to the Firstboot text.  So I asked.
>
>> The legal team for the company you work for has approved this.
>
> Now we know this is true, so I'm no longer concerned, and I'll go
> study copyrights on collections, since my lack of knowledge on this
> topic is showing ;-)

Easy, everyone. :-)

I've sent Mark a note with some of the comments in this thread, and if 
he wants to recommend any changes to firstboot or EULA text, he will.

--Max

-- 
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list