codec buddy pain

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 21:27 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> Can't we all please stop the alarmist tone, and just try codeina once,
> before continuing this discussion ? I am surprised how much of this
> discussion seems to be based on hearsay or reading reviews.

Another piece of hearsay:

http://fedora-tutorials.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/

The sequence shown in that post has no Board-approved dialog pop-up.  It
seems to be the standard codeina -- pop a dialog that gives the option
to get some non-free codecs, then walk the user through a purchasing
situation.

Is that review based on an old version?

I won't go into all the things that disturb me if that is an accurate
review based on current packages; I'll do as you ask, and wait to find
out.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20071107/32799e32/attachment.sig>