codec buddy pain

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:21 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> No, this is not correct. We entirely control the initial dialog that
> explains the situation (what has been dubbed "the sermon" in early
> reviews) and contains the link to the fedora wiki, and we have changed
> the wording of that dialog in the run-up to F8, based on feedback from
> people from this list. 

This is what I understood was happening.

If it is an advertisement, or has the workflow that Seth posted[1], or
has any how-to-buy-directly stuff still, that is a 'RED ALERT' condition
and needs to be fixed as a zero-day update.  We would also need some
marketing/pr-type correction out there as well.

- Karsten

[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-November/msg00036.html
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20071106/cb0a7823/attachment.sig>