Legal update

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Fri Nov 16 15:05:09 UTC 2007


Rahul Sundaram (sundaram at fedoraproject.org) said: 
> I had the impression that it was about linking to the repository package 
> directly instead of just the website? If even linking to the website itself 
> from a dialog box in codeina is not ok with Red Hat Legal,

It's not. What part of 'you may not link to the repository in the software'
is hard to understand?

> update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CodecBuddy or in the second dialog 
> where it lists the Fluendo codecs, we could introduce a new link that says 
> "click here for free alternatives" or something similar. Is that ok?

Again, that second dialog is in the software itself, populated from the
XML file.

Bill




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list