Legal Update

[Rahul Sundaram]

Jesse Keating wrote:


> I personally feel that you're trying any way possible to get around
> what Legal has said.  It's very reasonable to assume that if you
> attempted to do /something/, were told that Fedora can't help you
> do /something/ but if you happen to look over /here/, that we are now
> putting context into what /here/ is and what /here/ provides.  This is
> what Legal does not want us to do.

You are trying to guess the legal outcome based on engineering logic 
which frequently is very different from logic (or what is the equivalent 
there) in the legal world.

I personally feel that what I am proposing is just fine and if there is 
any doubt about that, we should ask Red Hat Legal directly instead of 
trying to guess what is allowed or not.

Rahul