Fedora Games Spin : Requesting Board Approval

[Mike McGrath]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
>
>>
>> Just because the bits are there doesn't mean that the combination of
>> bits boots and works.  And that's the focus of the testing --
>> integration testing as opposed to component testing
>
> How much of that applies to a games spin? What do I do to move this 
> forward?

Well from the Infrastructure side come up with a secure, reproducible 
mechanism to get your bits to us.  I'm not that familiar with 
revisor/pungi but is there a way to create a spin then save the configs, 
give it to us to re-create?  If so then I guess we'd just need to create 
an SCM where you (and others) could send their configs once they're 
approved.  At first I can only imagine a handful of spins that, 
hopefully, change rarely (like per release).  If thats the case I think 
we could commit some resources to doing it manually until the final 
solution is figured out[1].  I think that seems reasonable since, in the 
future, it'd probably be very similar except the building part would be 
automated.

Thoughts?

    -Mike


[1]  As a trial only, this way we can say no to people or just stop if 
we run out of resources or decide its not working out.