Fedora Project Board Recap 2008-07-29

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 15:23 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 14:56 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I could have sworn that the feature process this time around would
> > > generate a tracking bug for each feature, which would then be attached
> > > to the release blocker bug, providing a very easy breakdown of release
> > > threatening bugs by feature.
> > 
> > Yeah, I thought so too. Whose responsibility is it to create the
> > tracker? The feature owner? FESCo once the feature is approved?  The
> > Feature Wrangler at some point? I think that the problem here is that
> > we set down a guideline without specifying clear procedures as to how
> > to implement that guideline, so everyone thinks that the "other guy"
> > is doing it.
> 
> The Feature Wrangler (John Poelstra) is supposed to do it upon Feature
> approval by FESCo.  IIRC, John is on vacation.  There is no problem that
> needs fixing, other than perhaps having a backup for John which is
> something that should probably happen anyway.

I did email John about this -- and yes, he has been on vacation.  I'll
help him get the bugs up to date next week, seeing as how I have a
vested interest in the feature progression.  At the same time, we'll
make it clearer who's got John's back in the future. :-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20080802/86b3b737/attachment.sig>