Fedora Board Recap 2008-JAN-29
jwboyer at gmail.com
Sat Feb 2 02:48:46 UTC 2008
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:30:08 -0800
John Poelstra <poelstra at redhat.com> wrote:
> === Contributor satisfaction ===
> * Schedule session for FUDCon in June
That seems a bit late and a bit too exclusive to me.
> * Unclear what best means of obtaining constructive feedback is
> * People remain free to comment on mailing lists
> === Timeliness & Format of Board Minutes ===
I'd like to state that these minutes are improved from the ones in the
recent past. Thank you.
> * Will seek to alleviate concerns raised on
> fedora-advisory-board-list at redhat.com by holding public meetings
> * Once each month
> * Targeted start date March 2008.
> * ACTIONS:
> * Talk to Mike McGrath and Infrastructure team to determine
> technical hurdles
> * Engage community to help overcome technical hurdles
Technical hurdles such as what? Every other SIG/Committee gets by with
public IRC meetings just fine...
> === Use of Fedora Name/Trademark ===
> * What is required for a package or a project to carry the Fedora name?
> * Need to publish guidelines on wiki
> * OWNER: Max Spevack
> * ACTION: post proposal to fedora-advisory-board-list
What about a relaxed trademark policy? Something like that could also
tie in with the subject below.
> === Post-release updates of custom spins ===
> * Should the board have to approve them?
> * We will hosts as many spins as we have space for
What determines priority? E.g. does a main secondary arch spin take
precedent over a language spin? Thoughts?
> * Need to determine the hosting requirements and limits
> * How long will spins stay around?
Suggestion: The EOL and are removed when the release they are based on
> === Community Architecture Update ===
> * Max Spevack
Was there an update or is this something that is being added to the
Board's agenda in the future?
More information about the fedora-advisory-board