Under 18, Wants to contribute
loupgaroublond at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 15:22:28 UTC 2008
On Feb 4, 2008 4:27 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 07:11 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 08:03:08AM -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > If the CLA does not mention age, then we have pretty much commented on
> > > the subject as much as we can.
> > this matter turns up quite often, and we should have some standard
> > answer, hopefully in a positive way. Otherwise everyone will have a
> > different dealing with this situation and it will often escalate into
> > f-a-b (which doesn't really resolve this, yet).
> > No, I'm not favouring Fedora Child Labour, I'm demanding it! ;)
> Yes, this is true. My concern, to be honest, is that if we start asking
> questions of the lawyers, we might get back answers. :)
> For example, what if we get back the answer, "If you are under the age
> of 18 in the USA, you need a parent's signature"? Where before we
> didn't have any such rule, now we have a rule *and* an unknown number of
> current contributors might be suddenly out of compliance.
Is this safer than turning a blind eye to it, and finding out we can
be sued later? I think it would be smarter to ask the lawyers,
knowing full well that we'll need a sane plan if they say no to anyone
under 18 without additional paperwork. It's just one boring chore
that could save our butts down the road.
More information about the fedora-advisory-board