Bugzilla permissions - cla_done required?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 05:18 -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:14 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > The argument that came to light, and was discussed on
> > fedora-devel-list[2] that FAS requires "too much" personal information
> > (i.e. home address, phone number, etc) in order to sign up for an
> > account and sign the CLA.  Access to bugzilla is controlled via FAS,
> > therefore, without an FAS account, access to triage bugs is a
> > non-starter.
> 
> I'm going to trust Red Hat's lawyers when they say they need that
> information in order to have the level of assurance to distribute a
> contribution.  If we need to get a hold of a contributor for any
> legitimate reason, it'll be a bummer if they really don't live at 123
> Main Street, Anywhere, USA.

As a side note, I don't think we have any process to allow someone to
notify us of a change of address.

> > So the question here is whether cla_done is required in order to
> > belong to the 'fedorabugs' group in FAS?  My vote is 'yes' for the
> > reasons listed above for now, revisit with FAS2, as was decided at
> > FESCo.
> 
> I missed this part.  FESCo has already decided how they want this
> handled?  And some folks aren't happy with that situation?
> 
> Without FAS2, I don't see a way around this.  That is, I guess something
> of a click-through CLA could be hacked up, by why spend the time on that
> over finishing FAS2?

If I've heard correctly thus far, FAS2 should debut in some form around
the beginning of March.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20080211/70b637c5/attachment.sig>