Bugzilla permissions - cla_done required?
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 16:27:00 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 05:18 -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:14 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > The argument that came to light, and was discussed on
> > fedora-devel-list that FAS requires "too much" personal information
> > (i.e. home address, phone number, etc) in order to sign up for an
> > account and sign the CLA. Access to bugzilla is controlled via FAS,
> > therefore, without an FAS account, access to triage bugs is a
> > non-starter.
> I'm going to trust Red Hat's lawyers when they say they need that
> information in order to have the level of assurance to distribute a
> contribution. If we need to get a hold of a contributor for any
> legitimate reason, it'll be a bummer if they really don't live at 123
> Main Street, Anywhere, USA.
As a side note, I don't think we have any process to allow someone to
notify us of a change of address.
> > So the question here is whether cla_done is required in order to
> > belong to the 'fedorabugs' group in FAS? My vote is 'yes' for the
> > reasons listed above for now, revisit with FAS2, as was decided at
> > FESCo.
> I missed this part. FESCo has already decided how they want this
> handled? And some folks aren't happy with that situation?
> Without FAS2, I don't see a way around this. That is, I guess something
> of a click-through CLA could be hacked up, by why spend the time on that
> over finishing FAS2?
If I've heard correctly thus far, FAS2 should debut in some form around
the beginning of March.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the fedora-advisory-board