codec buddy, fluendo, etc.
loupgaroublond at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 03:52:09 UTC 2008
On Feb 11, 2008 10:45 PM, Luis Villa <luis at tieguy.org> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 10:40 PM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 2008 3:23 PM, Luis Villa <luis at tieguy.org> wrote:
> > > > Such open data does
> > > > not need to be created using open tools, though of course that is
> > > > preferable.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to think of a case where one can create open data, but only
> > > with proprietary tools, and failing- I must be missing something
> > > obvious, though.
> > You mean writing open source code using an OSI approved license
> > written by Microsoft, to work on Microsoft created platform that might
> > also run on Linux one day once the evil penguin devil hath been
> > vanquished, using development tools that are as closed as an ex
> > girlfriend's bedroom, to participate in a "Open Source Ecology" that
> > Microsoft is trying desperately to latch on to in a manner more
> > contradictory than a Scientology Text Book?
> I'm not really concerned with anything Windows specific, since
> anything so tied to Windows is never going to be proposed for
> inclusion in Fedora.
You never know. I'm imagining that if such a thing were to happen,
there would be alot of interesting .NET and Mono code coming out that
will probably get some level of Multiplatform love. I hope I was
sarcastic enough about the death of the penguin devil.
More information about the fedora-advisory-board