What makes a spin a Spin?
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at gmail.com
Wed Feb 27 01:51:23 UTC 2008
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:16:35 -0500 (EST)
Max Spevack <mspevack at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> > Sortof. It seems that Max wants to empower folks in areas to create
> > and share things called Fedora without going through releng / QA
> > because releng / QA resources are finite. I tend to want this too,
> > but in a way that the product is labeled as contrib and not official
> > Fedora.
>
> Sortof right back at you.
>
> What I want is:
>
> (1) A clear set of guidelines for what it takes for something to be an
> official spin. For example, KDE is an official spin. Games is an
> official spin, right? So is Electronics Lab. Is XFCE an official spin?
Um... didn't I ask for that with the very first email in this thread?
I'm pretty sure I did, because that's the whole reason I started it in
the first place.
> If I am a person who has created a spin, and I want it to become
> "official", I want to know what steps are necessary to take.
>
> I also want to be able to see the .ks files for all the official spins,
> because that will help me to create my own spin in a way that is likely
> to have a higher initial quality than if I just go off on my own,
> because I'm working from a known-good starting point.
Jeremy has a fairly good suggestion for this.
> (2) A place for people to share the spins that are not "blessed" like
> those in group (1). Perhaps this is just the CustomSpins page on the
> Fedora wiki, which can have pointers off to .ks files and hosted spins
> elsewhere.
This seems reasonable.
> (3) A description of how spins in group (1) should be named, and how
> spins in group (2) should be named.
Named as in how? Do you have an example?
> My feeling is that we have talked around a lot of these issues many
> times, but never actually codified the decisions in a single place, and
> figured out who is responsible for keeping that document updated, or
> modifying it when necessary.
I think it's partly because no decisions have been made. It's quite
hard for either group (rel-eng and the Board) to figure out how to
decide on certain things when they keep passing the buck to each other.
So here is something I want the _Board_ to decided. Do they want to
codify what falls into the official spins category and tell rel-eng, or
do they want to leave it up to rel-eng to suggest which spins should be
official? IMHO, the Board should have final say in either case but the
initial recommendation should come from rel-eng.
josh
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list