dormant bugs and our perception
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 16:11:41 UTC 2008
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:05:40 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> writes:
> >
> > RS> The fact that bugz.fp.o is separate instead of being part of
> > RS> bugzilla to me, indicates that we have a problem.
> >
> > I'm having trouble understanding how a quick interface to a few set
> > queries is a problem. Surely it's a good thing that bugzilla lets us
> > do this.
>
> Enhancements like this should be part of bugzilla and not a separate
> interface. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/rpm can be modified to do this.
> The reason why we don't it is because pretty much nobody in Fedora has
> access to that bugzilla instance to make improvements that benefit Fedora.
That's not specific to bugzilla and generally will not change unless
Fedora does not use Red Hat IS.
Frankly, I don't see a problem. It's an enhancement that Fedora can
control, while still reaping the benefits of using the Red Hat bugzilla
instance.
josh
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list