closing out old bugs of unmaintained releases

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Jan 5 12:47:32 UTC 2008


On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:28:32 +0100
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:

> In fact, something like the above is what I always do and did for my
> packages (and had to do, as I'm a package-monkey and no developer).
> 
> IOW: if it's not a packaging bug or otherwise specific to Fedora I
> asked the reported to report the bug upstream, as the bug gets fixed
> for everyone then -- that includes other distributions and thus is
> the best for everyone and avoid double work in our current world with
> fivehundred-and-more distributions. If the reported didn't forward the
> bug upstream I did it if the bug looked worth forwarding.

Except that as a maintainer it's one of your responsibilities to do
some of the upstream filing/tracking.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20080105/06033bb1/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list