Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)

[Matt Domsch]

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:48:43PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:31 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> 
> > I agree that it would be hard to get this without splitting, and that
> > Bugzilla is cluttered enough as-is, but given the other benefits of
> > staying upstream, I'd suggest that greasemonkey or a server-side
> > 'fedora view' which hide these extra features are better ways to solve
> > this.
> > 
> 
> It might be worthwhile to split if we could ensure one feature worked
> from rh-bz to fedora bz: report migration. It'd be great if fedora bz
> could have an 'add this to rh bz'. That would make interaction easier
> and, hopefully, make the transition easier for rh employees.

'add this to rh bz for product version $foo' would be even nicer.  I
routinely have to dupe bugs several times, once for each affected RHEL
version, and once for each other impacted product.

Not that I like Launchpad being proprietary (and that's clearly a
showstopper here), but it has this concept of integrating with other
bug trackers in this manner (and keeping track that you did so), which
is very convenient.