Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal at fedoraproject.org) said: 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:31 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > 
> > > I agree that it would be hard to get this without splitting, and that
> > > Bugzilla is cluttered enough as-is, but given the other benefits of
> > > staying upstream, I'd suggest that greasemonkey or a server-side
> > > 'fedora view' which hide these extra features are better ways to solve
> > > this.
> > 
> > It might be worthwhile to split if we could ensure one feature worked
> > from rh-bz to fedora bz: report migration. It'd be great if fedora bz
> > could have an 'add this to rh bz'. That would make interaction easier
> > and, hopefully, make the transition easier for rh employees.
> > 
> > it should be do-able, I think.
> 
> I don't see why this would require a split, though.
> 

b/c as it is, the process to change and get new features into rh's
bugzilla is slow and laborious, at least afaict.

-sv