"Action Items" From FUDCon?

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Mon Jan 14 15:30:45 UTC 2008



On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Max Spevack wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> > * being a WordPress/Lyceum (multiuser) provider
>
> If the decision is made to do this, then any work that we do in this area
> could be immediately useful to Red Hat Magazine, which has had occasionaly
> infrastructure difficulties but right now is running on Lyceum.
>
> I'd be willing to wager that the Fedora setup could meet our needs and also
> theirs, and perhaps lead to a deal in which whatever hardware they are using
> can be included into our pool provided that we keep Red Hat Magazine up, which
> would be a very small amount of additional work on top of what it seems like
> we might do anyway.
>
> Does what I'm trying to say make sense?  If we do X work to get our own
> multi-user blog infrastructure up, for a very small amount we might be able to
> do a better and cheaper job for the Red Hat Magazine folks, and in doing so be
> able to make use of some of their hardware.

This is something we can certainly look at.  I've created a bug for those
that want to take an interest in how its installed/reviewed:

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/342

Its down as a Fedora 10 milestone though hopefully we can get some time /
space to do it prior to that.

	-Mike




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list