Fedora Board election results

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 09:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 07:23 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> I can see a lot of good points in the discussion.  But if it all boils
> > > >> down to "I don't have time to participate in Fedora governance," then just
> > > >> say that.  Because that's really what you are saying.
> > > > Partially correct.
> > > >
> > > > Better would be: I don't have time nor interest in actively
> > > > participating in this governance system. I do have the time and interest
> > > > to vote on MY delegate, such that I feel my opinion is represented in
> > > > this "governance system".
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think we are still suffering from communication bit loss somewhere
> > > (German to English or just the human usual I forgot to type
> > > something). Are you wanting regional representational democracy?
> > > organizational representational democracy?
> > Nope. I want "a delegate whose intentions/interests match with mine at
> > least to some extend" and whom I learned to be trustworthy.
> >
> 
> I'm curious Ralf, can you name 3 things that a candidate might have that
> match your criteria?

In this vote, my criteria has been (in decreasing importance):
* Not being @RH, because I wanted to see the community strengthened in
this already @RH-predominated FPB and therefore don't see much reason
into adding more @RHs.
* Exclude people of whom I had learned not to be trustworthy.
* People having a measurable record as Fedora contributor.
* The candidates' interests overlapping with my personal interests.

Ralf