Fedora Board Recap 2008-JUN-24
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Mon Jun 30 12:45:11 UTC 2008
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> The notes indicate the Board's awareness of how the changes are being
> made, not that it is dictating these changes, so these notes and the
> policy of having FESCo be responsible for engineering issues are not
> really in conflict.
I would argue that Codeina itself is a technical detail and shouldn't be
managed by the board anymore which has discussed it in half a dozen
meetings already. There are several other things that deserve more
attention that this particular feature. Board can just make a policy
decision on where it draws the line on free software and leave it at that.
Rahul
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list