the Fedora filters
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Sat Mar 22 04:03:20 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 23:45 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 20:38 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> > I'm going to drag firmware and such in here; not because I'm arguing for
> > them as a form of software. They are permitted in our distribution in
> > ways that either are exceptions or orthogonal to the free filter and the
> > open source filter. Or is the argument they are not even part of the
> > equation because rule them to be "not software"?
> I really don't want to have the religious argument, so let me just say
> that we treat firmware as a special exception to the rules.
Right, and we want to find a way to show that these exceptions can work
in the filtering. This is why the zeroeth filter is immutable (no
exceptions), the others perhaps less so.
> I'd have to draw a flow chart to explain it, and email is a very poor
> medium for this. Firmware isn't the only exception, some specific
> content is also handled under less stringent restrictions than software.
I think we are looking for something that can be a filter/flow to refer
to that shows how you manage good enough and exceptions, which doesn't
embody every exception. However, having a page that explains our
exceptions/hair splitting case-by-case would be useful. Pretty pictures
might help there. :)
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the fedora-advisory-board