Spins
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Sun Nov 2 23:25:36 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 13:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> This is a small but important detail. I'd like to make an exception for
> OLPC and the Sugar build. I know not the reasons this build did not make
> the feature freeze but they did not. When they asked for space on Fedora
> People they were told no. So they kept asking around until someone
> increased their space on Fedora People and I had to be the bad guy.
[and]
> Fedora's policies and procedures are far from
> perfect, but they are there. If you don't like them change them but don't
> think Infrastructure is going to route around what has been put in place.
I think the Sugar spin was also the victim of bad timing, which is why I
would consider requesting/recommending an _exception_ to the rule. It's
OK to break rules, as long as it is known, discussed, and approved. I
agree, we do not want people (un)intentionally gaming our system.
My recollection of Board discussions around space and bandwidth hogs
such as spins and secondary archs are pretty clear -- we were very much
in favor of space/band usage being the sole discretion of Infrastructure
in consultation with Release Engineering. If that is not clear, let's
make it so.
So, what I see here instead is that you _do_ have the final say on this,
and you are asking f-a-b if "no" is a big deal from a Project
perspective. I don't see that you have to ask permission. I also
appreciate that you are asking for this guidance, just in case it is a
big deal, etc.
In pursuit of that, I've asked Greg to comment on this thread and help
negotiate wherever needed. Hopefully he'll know the big deal/no big
deal and so forth.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20081102/69b03856/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list