John Poelstra poelstra at redhat.com
Tue Nov 4 04:11:39 UTC 2008

Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> True that spins aren't the same as features, but they normally require
>> a feature page for tracking.  Part of the reason for this is to make
>> sure the spin gets promotion in the feature process.
> I've looked at the spins sig page and I am uber confused.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Spins
> links to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JefSpaleta/SpinReleaseProcessProposal
> which really couldn't be a worse guide from a spin proposer perspective
> (it is the proposal for the sig itself to follow).  I think:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Spins/SpinSubmissionProcess
> is the page the sig intends people to follow.  I've also come to find out
> there's a whole slew of options in spins hosting, just the ks for example
> can get approved for hosting but never built and distributed as an
> official fedora spin.
> That page does mention a feature page requirement but doesn't really talk
> about timelines nor expectations.
> 	-Mike

I think these are probably valid observations considering we met a month 
ago and haven't done a specific follow-up on what was discussed or still 
needs to be figured out.


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list