Fedora 11 schedule proposal

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Wed Nov 12 01:32:40 UTC 2008

On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 16:40 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 19:30 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > Looks pretty reasonable to me.  My big concern is if we slip for F11
> > (which given our past track record is fairly likely) we'll be reducing
> > the F12 development cycle even more.
> Yep, that's always a concern.  That's why I wouldn't want to commit hard
> to any F12 dates.  We would certainly re-evaluate the F12 plan once F11
> is "in the can" as it were.  But we can have the "if everything goes as
> planned" type targets.

Yeah, though we should keep in mind it's a lot easier to handle a slip
for the May release, than it is for the October release (due to the
holiday season, which we experienced this go around).

Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20081111/9a39b7d0/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list