Fedora 11 schedule proposal

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Thu Nov 13 00:01:15 UTC 2008

On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 11:51 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > FESCo, then the Board?  Or the Board can delegate to FESCo?  One of the
> > two.
> Is this really Board fodder at all?  I'm of the opinion that RelEng
> oversight is completely and utterly FESCo's jurisdiction.  If FESCo
> wants to punt to the Board, okay I guess...but if FESCo can't come to
> a decision on this... is the Board better equipped to do it?  I really
> really doubt we'd overrule FESCo's decision given the same public
> discussion as context .

No, this is a FESCo decision, just like in past releases.  It would only
be escalated to the Board, if for some unforeseeable reason FESCo
couldn't come to a resolution.

Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20081112/5ec79e8c/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list