Fedora Remix mark

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 08:54 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Tom spot Callaway
> > I'll probably whip up a "fedora-remix-logos" package once we have the
> > licensing and guidelines set in stone.
> 
> And maybe remix-release and remix-release-notes to match the generic-*
> package set we have now?

I don't see us producing a remix-release-notes.  fedora-release-notes
_could_ be built to be made generic, as per the generic-logos, but it's
not there.  

I'm unclear if it is an imperative that we do make that possible.  The
release notes are a snapshot in time of the packages, and are out of
date fairly quickly with package updates.  Someone doing a remix and
wanting to base on fedora-release-notes would need to confirm and update
all the content; excise out irrelevant content; etc.

Until someone wants it and is willing to do the work to make it happen,
a {generic,remix}-release-notes is unlikely.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20081016/71c9402c/attachment.sig>