Follow-up on Extended Life Cycle
jwboyer at gmail.com
Tue Jul 21 16:26:45 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:53:58AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:25:44AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> As I recall,this Extended Life Cycle feature is already defined to
>> cover everything, so that wouldn't be necessary.
>I'm reading here:
>I don't see any such definition. I also don't see a definition for
>the length of time, or issue severity coverage. (The last of these,
>to be fair, Jeroen explicitly asked us to weigh in on.)
>There's an admonition that says, "Note that the following items may
>only apply to those that opt-in on ELC support." That sounds pretty
>open-ended too. If Jeroen and the rest of the group signed up on the
>wiki page are interested in doing this in Fedora, they need to round
>up those details and put them in the page for consideration.
I spoke with Jeroen about that this morning. He said he was going to rework
the wiki page soon.
More information about the fedora-advisory-board