changing content licenses (OPL => CC BY SA)

[Robert 'Bob' Jensen]

----- "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO, a move to CC BY-SA is more supportive of Fedora's mission to
> promote free and interchangeable content, and makes sense.
> 

Does anyone remember why "CC BY SA" was not chosen over the OPL when we went through all this a few years ago? Is this just all part of the Creative Commons marketing effort? An effort that is failing for me, the idea of a "CC" license is diluted and confused by all the different options. It seems today everyone has to have a (CC) license, soon to become the "Members Only" jacket of the early 80's?

-- Bob 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       Robert 'Bob' Jensen        ||       Fedora Unity Founder       |
|       bob at fedoraunity.org        ||      http://fedoraunity.org/     |
|                   http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/                   |
|                http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen                |
------------------------------------------------------------------------