changing content licenses (OPL => CC BY SA)
Robert 'Bob' Jensen
bob at fedoraunity.org
Thu Jun 25 11:31:46 UTC 2009
----- "Robert 'Bob' Jensen" <bob at fedoraunity.org> wrote:
> Does anyone remember why "CC BY SA" was not chosen over the OPL when
> we went through all this a few years ago? Is this just all part of the
> Creative Commons marketing effort? An effort that is failing for me,
> the idea of a "CC" license is diluted and confused by all the
> different options. It seems today everyone has to have a (CC) license,
> soon to become the "Members Only" jacket of the early 80's?
>
I guess my question was, is this change for the sake of change? Nothing gained from how I read Richard's comment.
-- Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robert 'Bob' Jensen || Fedora Unity Founder |
| bob at fedoraunity.org || http://fedoraunity.org/ |
| http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/ |
| http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list