CC repo

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 17:37:31 UTC 2009


Re: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/65

Thanks to Jon for capturing the Board notes into that ticket.  I meant
to respond to FESCo by Wednesday but failed.  You can find the Board
meeting log here for more information:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2009-03-03

It seemed like a little over half of the Board was interested in the
idea and generally positive about it, but was unsure of the parameters
for a project to which trademark approval would apply.  A couple -1
votes were also captured before the Board generally agreed they needed
more data for an informed decision.

I think the best way to move forward would be for the originator to
write a proposal that clarifies at least the following, to address
some of the questions raised in the Board meeting:

* Why a repo and not a cross-distro tool?

* Would we be creating an issue for CC originators who lose traffic to
  a Fedora-specific content container?  If so, how do we mitigate it?

I'm cc'ing the fedora-advisory-board list and setting followups to go
there.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20090306/05c1db51/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list