Proposal for ML conduct

[Seth Vidal]

> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 16:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
>> The delegated monitors will warn violators of our "Be excellent to
>> each other" policy in the form of a one-day list moderation (with
>> notice to the poster).  Messages not allowed through will be returned
>> to the poster with explanation as to why they were not allowed.
>
> So, the monitor will send a private email to the poster and put the
> poster under moderation.
>
> How could this process be more open?

It doesn't need to be.

>
> How can we allow the poster to defend themselves publicly?

They have no right to a public defense - this isn't a court of law, we are 
not a gov't. There are no rights here.

> How can monitors avoid being accused of acting unreasonably?

By not acting unreasonably.

And if someone thinks they are being messed with by a monitor then they 
can bring it to the board.

-sv