Proposal for ML conduct

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 08:56 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Dictating something from the top without bothering to ask those that are 
> effected by the decision(¹) imho isn't either.
> 
> CU
> knurd
> 
> (¹) e.g. ask on fedora-devel-list for options before making the rules 
> official, as not everyone is on this list. And yes, I'm well aware that 
> doing that might yet again create a bumpy discussion, but in the end you 
> can at least say "okay, you wanted it like this" and "we gave you the 
> chance to come up with something better" ;-) Especially the latter is 
> something really important.

Nearly, if not, all members of the board are also subscribers to the
list.  I think we're uniquely suited to gather opinions amongst our
selves (as well as the community via f-a-b and the meeting minutes)
about how we'd like to see the issue resolved.  Remember, the board is
made of many volunteers as well.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20090515/6325f48c/attachment.sig>