Be excellent - answer questions

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Tue May 19 14:30:49 UTC 2009


Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Tom "spot" Callaway:
> On 05/19/2009 10:08 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Sorry, but I disagree. Remember, we already had ambassadors leaving the
> > project after the CLA changed. I don't share their concerns (otherwise I
> > had to resign, too), but I do see there are people not willing to sign
> > the current CLA which means they cannot get a FAS account.
> 
> This is a separate issue, lets not dogpile everything together
> unnecessarily. There are some legitimate issues with the current CLA
> that I am constantly working on resolving, but this is perhaps the most
> complicated legal matter currently on Fedora Legal's plate. Even with
> that, your statement that a CLA signature is required to get a FAS
> account is not accurate. It is necessary to sign the CLA to make a
> contribution to Fedora, but not simply to get a FAS account.

Thanks Spot for this correction. I signed the CLA back in the days long
before FAS, so I wasn't aware of this.

> ~spot

Regards,
Christoph




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list