Desktop Proposal
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Mon Oct 12 15:42:03 UTC 2009
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:06 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > Have FESCo look at requiring approval for major version updates in the
> > middle of a release or possibly banning them outright. This also has a
> > side effect of fewer updates which many find desirable. This may end up
> > working on the honor system but should be possible while not compromising
> > our first mission objective.
> >
> > This could also be coupled with the experimental repo mentioned above to
> > bring new packages to stable releases but only to those who accept the
> > potential consequences and have enabled such a repo.
>
> This is what updates-testing is for. If it doesn't work in
> updates-testing, you can just drop it on the floor. The problem is when
> it gets promoted from -testing to updates. We do /not/ want a third
> repo here, that makes the logistics balloon out of control.
>
This is not what updates testing is for. Stuff in updates testing for F11
is for packages that are, ultimately, destined for F-11. The experimental
repo for F-11 would be for packages that are destined for F-12 if at all.
Additionally stuff "working" in testing and being pushed to stable is the
problem. The firefox example is a good example of this as is the
thunderbird update mentioned on fedora-devel. Thunderbird should never
have been pushed to F-11 under this proposal. The new thunderbird would
be released and updated in the experimental repo. The old thunderbird
would continue to get updates in F-11 proper.
-Mike
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list