About long self-definition discussions

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Fri Oct 16 16:16:46 UTC 2009

Dimitris Glezos (glezos at indifex.com) said: 
> I beieve the long threads about what is Fedora are extremely valuable.
> But I also believe that we online/email is not the best place to have
> them.
> We have these excellent events called FUDCons and FADs. I believe the
> Board/RH should take a bold decision and sponsor the travel of a few
> key people to participate in the nearest event, and have a 4-hour
> workshop about our direction. Specifically, the Board should be there,
> as well as past Board members, key people in the community (eg. very
> active FESCo members etc), and anyone else wanting to participate in
> this discussion.
> Clearly, online talk isn't really leading anywhere. Or it leads
> somewhere in a very painful and slow way.

I'd prefer transparency to at least the direction discussions.
Implementation is where you really need the doers to go off, meet,
and do.


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list