Ratification of FAMSCO leadership roles for 2010

Gerold Kassube gerold at lugd.org
Thu Jan 7 23:02:10 UTC 2010


I'm also a bit wondering ...

Is that request a "approval" or a "acceptance" question?

Regards

Gerold much confused atm



Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2010, 16:51 -0500 schrieb Max Spevack: 
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> 
> > Just curious, why does this need the Boards approval?
> 
> Because that's part of the FAMSCO election process -- which of course 
> can be changed.
> 
> That clause is in there from a few years ago, as ensuring a 
> check-and-balance, respect for the little bits of hierarchy that we do 
> have, etc.
> 
> --Max
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-advisory-board mailing list
> fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20100108/f699bf84/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list