[Fedora-ambassadors-list] RedHat v/s Fedora Events

[Thomas Canniot]

Le dimanche 09 avril 2006 à 13:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Hi
> 
> > > In my opinion, "Unleash KDE" is the right word. But since Fedora is commited 
> > > to proposing both environments at install time, we need to be able to 
> > > install from Extras in Anaconda, plus we need to do the work of moving KDE 
> > > out of core, with all the dependencies, and that's just a lot of work.
> > > 
> > Having to connect yourself to the internet during the installation
> > process, with dhcp, is *absolutely* not user-friendly at all.
> 
> Why does Fedora installation require a net connection? Not sure what you
> are talking about here. 
If wa are able to install a packages from Extras in Anaconda during the
installation process, then we need to be connected to the internet,
needn't we?

Perhaps i don't understand everything very well, it's sunday morning :)

Thomas

> 
> > Wouldn't it be easier to have : 
> > Fedora base : 2 cds
> > Gnome : 1 cds
> > KDE : 1 cds 
> > 
> > and a question in anaconda asking "what cds do you have?", and then
> > suggesting the right packages thanks to the answer we provided.
> > 
> > It sounds that i'm off topic here :)
> 
> Yes you are. These ideas have been suggested before and generally been
> accepted as good ones. Just need people, resources and time to work on
> it. 
> 
> Rahul
> 
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20060409/31f03fce/attachment.sig>