[Ambassadors] Arguments needed

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:14 +0100, Thomas Canniot wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 février 2007 à 08:19 -0600, Rex Dieter a écrit :
> > Thomas Canniot wrote:
> > 
> > > Trying to promote Fedora and the use of yum (instead of third manager
> > > like smart) 
> > 
> > Why (yum vs smart)?
> > 
> 
> smart seems faster from his point of view, downloading packages for
> example, as it is able to download many packages at the same time.

I don't use smart, so can anyone explain this part to me?  Is there a
difference between downloading 3 packages at 100KB/sec each, and
downloading 1 package at 300KB/sec?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20070214/74f96da0/attachment.sig>