[Ambassadors] Pre-made presentations

[rafael liu]

I've been quit busy, sorry for the delay. I started creating a doc with the
archives and their dates but after a few presentations I realized that they
all had the same date. There has been a migration and all docs have the same
date. The docs themselves don't have dates.

What do you sugest? We could create a /NewPresentations where new
presentations post would follow the field schema. And there would be a link
to /NewPresentation in the /Presentation page together with a warning
stating to post presentations in /NewPresentation.

After a time /NewPresentation would become /Presentation and /Presentation
would become /OldPresentation. Otherwise, if we moved all /Presentation to
/OldPresentation now we would have a blank presentation page..

Rafael Liu



On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Max Spevack <mspevack at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, rafael liu wrote:
>
>  Can we really consolidate those two pages?.. Maybe we could talk to
>> CommunityArchitecture team to post their presentations on the new page
>> (maybe on a session of their own).
>>
>
> I maintain that other page, so I'm happy to migrate.  The *reason* I have a
> separate CommunityArchitecture/Presentations page was just to escape the
> clutter of the main /Presentations page, so if we clean up /Presentations,
> it will solve everything.
>
>  I'll order the presentations by date in their own session and put the date
>> on the description. We would maintain this format for these pre-our-changes
>> presentations.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> That's great.  Thank you!  And I realize your initial goal was wider. Let's
> start here, and eventually we'll get to your larger goal.  :)
>
>
> --Max
>
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20080801/92ed71b3/attachment.htm>