[Ambassadors] Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Tue Dec 9 14:30:43 UTC 2008


On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:15:41AM -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2008-12-09 10:51:10 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> > About the legal constraints, I can totally understand that RedHat (the
> > private company) has to keep some informations. But in that case, RedHat
> > engineers should take over the issue and no one in Fedora should be aware
> > of it. Right now, we're in some kind of middle stage where only an elit of
> > Fedora people can be in the secret, and others are being despised. This
> > doesn't make a healthy community.
> I'm sorry, where did you get the idea that any "elite group" of Fedora
> people are in to some secret?  
> 
> What bothers me about this whole thing is that some Fedora community
> members are taking the heat for not giving enough information, even
> though they're not the ones making the decision of what they're allowed
> to say.  
> 
> Please don't bash them for somebody else's decision.

There are *NO* Fedora community members who should be taking heat for
anything to do with the intrusion report, other than myself.  If
anyone has questions about forthcoming information, they should be
directed to me.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20081209/0afcfbc3/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list