[Ambassadors] Fedora Local Language Spins

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:08:09 +0100
Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com> wrote:

> Basically there *cannot* be a problem in getting a live spin in any 
> language pass Q&A if the (default) language is all that has changed,
> or if OOo(-langpack) is all that has been added. Part of how Release 
> Engineering and Q&A wanted to compose the live spins had to do 
> reproducibility, so if the same spin off the same tree is being 
> reproduced several times with only a different language each, giving
> a thumbs up to each of those spins should be a breeze. Quality cannot
> be a problem considering the way the compose tools have been set up,
> and if quantity is a problem, really, you're back to a quality
> problem in the compose tools and reproducibility becomes utopia.


That depends on having all the languages composed at once, or composed
only against the GOLD release packages.  The QA issues come in when
each language is spun with a different set of updates included, which
may or may not effect the user experience, particularly installing.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20080226/1a22a633/attachment.sig>