[Ambassadors] EMEA: Preliminary Statutes

red_alert red_alert at the-psychiatry.ch
Sun Jan 20 21:47:38 UTC 2008

Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> You suggest we should not differentiate between different kinds of 
> memberships which I think is OK as it both simplifies the Statutes, 
> bookkeeping and accounting, and isn't as obscure to (potential) new 
> members. If anyone thinks differently though, now is the time to tell us 
> ;-)

Not exactly. I'd like to have legal persons pay more than natural 
persons. i.e. having different mandatory/maximum fees for both. But 
without a difference in number of votes or so.

> If we're not getting any contra's, the concept of honorary members is 
> getting in the Statutes. The way someone could become an honorary member 
> is to be determined at a later point when we have something drafted up. 
> I'm sure there'll be something such as a 3/4 majority GMM has to agree 
> and maybe something like only the board can propose such, although I'm 
> not much in favor of the minimum 5 years of membership limit.

Me neither. Say 3/4 of GMM and the board Concordant...that'd be good.


More information about the Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list