[Ambassadors] EMEA: Preliminary Statutes
red_alert at the-psychiatry.ch
Sun Jan 20 21:47:38 UTC 2008
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> You suggest we should not differentiate between different kinds of
> memberships which I think is OK as it both simplifies the Statutes,
> bookkeeping and accounting, and isn't as obscure to (potential) new
> members. If anyone thinks differently though, now is the time to tell us
Not exactly. I'd like to have legal persons pay more than natural
persons. i.e. having different mandatory/maximum fees for both. But
without a difference in number of votes or so.
> If we're not getting any contra's, the concept of honorary members is
> getting in the Statutes. The way someone could become an honorary member
> is to be determined at a later point when we have something drafted up.
> I'm sure there'll be something such as a 3/4 majority GMM has to agree
> and maybe something like only the board can propose such, although I'm
> not much in favor of the minimum 5 years of membership limit.
Me neither. Say 3/4 of GMM and the board Concordant...that'd be good.
More information about the Fedora-ambassadors-list