[Ambassadors] Re: ambassadors, marketing, etc

[Andreas Rau]

I totally agree with your statement

> Basically, fedora-ambassadors-list is for discussions amongst
> Ambassadors about event coordination and other tactical or project
> business needs.
> 
> Other discussions should take place in fedora-marketing-list.

-1 concerning the merge

kind regards,
Andreas Rau
Am Montag, den 14.01.2008, 13:42 -0800 schrieb Thomas Chung:
> On 14/01/2008, Paul Stauffer <paulds at bu.edu> wrote:
> > Perhaps it would be a good idea for one of the list admins (Max? Thomas?) to
> > do a quick diff of the membership lists of these two lists and see if there
> > is as much of an intersection as we're assuming.  If it turns out that f-a-l
> > membership is primarily just a subset of f-m-l membership, then the question
> > is really just whether the ambassadors want to continue to have a separate
> > list or not.  And conversely, if the intersection is smaller than we're
> > assuming, then that might imply that a merger is unwarranted.
> >
> > Being on both lists myself, and recognizing the close interaction of the
> > work of both groups, and thus the extremely heavy cross-posting between the
> > two lists, I myself would be happy for a merger, just to cut down the number
> > of duplicate messages in my inbox.  But, y'know, I can deal either way. :)
> 
> Back in March, Karsten Wade touched on this issue[1] already what's
> considered OffTopic[2].
> 
> [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2007-March/msg00011.html
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PostIsOffTopic#fedora-ambassadors-list
> 
> Basically, fedora-ambassadors-list is for discussions amongst
> Ambassadors about event coordination and other tactical or project
> business needs.
> 
> Other discussions should take place in fedora-marketing-list.
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Chung
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
>